Chile’s healthcare system is a dual-structure model that ensures near-universal health coverage through both public and private insurance options. The public system is managed by FONASA (Fondo Nacional de Salud), while the private system is administered by ISAPREs (Instituciones de Salud Previsional). Each offers distinct advantages and limitations based on income, preference, and medical needs. Here’s a comparative look at their similarities and differences.
Similarities
- Mandatory Contribution:
All formal sector workers and pensioners are legally required to contribute 7% of their income to health insurance. This applies to both systems—whether the individual chooses FONASA or an ISAPRE plan. - Universal Access Principle:
Both systems aim to provide access to essential healthcare services. Regardless of the choice between public and private, beneficiaries can receive treatment for a wide range of conditions, especially under the AUGE/GES plan, which mandates guaranteed access for 80 high-impact diseases. - Regulation by the Government:
The Ministry of Health regulates both sectors, overseeing care standards, provider networks, and financial operations to ensure fairness and efficiency within the national health landscape. - Coverage for Dependents:
Both FONASA and ISAPREs allow the inclusion of dependents such as spouses and children under the main contributor’s policy.
Differences
- Funding Sources and Eligibility:
- FONASA is publicly funded, receiving money from both mandatory contributions and general taxation. It covers 73% of the population, including low-income individuals, unemployed people, pregnant women, and dependents.
- ISAPREs, on the other hand, are privately funded by members’ contributions, which typically exceed the 7% baseline. Membership is voluntary and mostly chosen by higher-income earners.
- FONASA is publicly funded, receiving money from both mandatory contributions and general taxation. It covers 73% of the population, including low-income individuals, unemployed people, pregnant women, and dependents.
- Access and Quality of Service:
- FONASA patients primarily use public hospitals and clinics, where care is generally comprehensive but may be subject to longer wait times and variability in service quality, particularly in rural areas.
- ISAPRE members enjoy shorter waiting times, greater physician choice, and access to private hospitals, which are generally perceived as offering better comfort and more advanced infrastructure.
- FONASA patients primarily use public hospitals and clinics, where care is generally comprehensive but may be subject to longer wait times and variability in service quality, particularly in rural areas.
- Cost Structure:
- FONASA services are free of charge as of 2022 for all beneficiaries, with copayments capped under the AUGE/GES plan.
- ISAPREs typically charge additional premiums beyond the 7% income contribution for broader benefits and superior service quality. Premiums can vary based on income, age, and risk group, although recent court rulings have challenged risk-based pricing practices.
- FONASA services are free of charge as of 2022 for all beneficiaries, with copayments capped under the AUGE/GES plan.
- Financial Stability:
- FONASA remains financially stable due to state support.
- ISAPREs are currently facing financial and legal challenges following a 2022 Supreme Court ruling that mandated premium refunds and the use of standardized risk tables, creating uncertainty in the sector.
- FONASA remains financially stable due to state support.
Public Health Insurance in Chile: Overview of FONASA and Its Key Features
Chile’s public health insurance is centered around a single entity: Fondo Nacional de Salud (FONASA). Unlike countries with multiple public insurers, FONASA is the sole public health insurance provider, covering over 73% of Chile’s population. It offers comprehensive healthcare services and is considered a critical component of Chile’s commitment to universal health coverage. Below is an in-depth analysis of FONASA based on cost, services, eligibility, financial structure, and consumer satisfaction.
1. Fondo Nacional de Salud (FONASA)(Official website: https://mi.fonasa.gob.cl)
Cost:
FONASA is funded through a mandatory 7% payroll tax from employees and pensioners. Additionally, the government subsidizes contributions for those who are unemployed or cannot afford to pay. For beneficiaries, as of September 2022, services under FONASA are free of charge, eliminating copayments across all income groups.
Available Services / Coverage Features:
FONASA provides access to a broad network of public hospitals, clinics, and approved private providers at fixed rates. Services include:
- Primary and specialized care
- Hospitalization and surgery
- Maternity and pediatric care
- Mental health services
- Emergency services
- Medications and chronic disease management
A standout feature of FONASA is the AUGE/GES plan, which guarantees care for 80 high-mortality and high-burden conditions, including cancer, diabetes, and mental health disorders. This plan ensures:
- Timely access
- Defined quality standards
- Affordability, with copayments capped at 20% of treatment costs and an annual limit equivalent to one month’s family income (prior to 2022’s reforms)
Open for All or Limited:
FONASA is open to all Chilean citizens and eligible legal residents, including:
- Formal employees and pensioners
- The unemployed receiving state benefits
- Pregnant women and children
- People classified as indigent or living in poverty
- People with disabilities and their dependents
There is no upper age limit, and enrollment is automatic for those not actively choosing private ISAPRE coverage.
Core Financial Features:
- 7% of gross income contribution from formal workers and pensioners
- Additional public funding through general taxation (covering more than 50% of public healthcare spending)
- Free healthcare services post-2022 reforms
- Prior to reforms, co-payments were low and structured by income group (Groups A–D)
Consumer Satisfaction Score:
FONASA generally receives moderate to high satisfaction scores in national surveys, especially since user fees were removed. Strengths include:
- Broad access to care
- Affordability
- Predictable and transparent pricing
However, challenges persist in:
- Long wait times
- Overcrowding
- Uneven quality of care, especially in rural and remote regions
Public perception improved significantly after the elimination of copayments, with many beneficiaries appreciating the financial relief and increased equity in service access.
Top 5 Private Health Insurance Providers in Chile
Chile’s private health insurance sector is managed by Instituciones de Salud Previsional (ISAPREs), which serve about 16% of the population. ISAPREs offer more personalized and faster healthcare access compared to the public system, typically attracting higher-income individuals. Below are the top five private health insurers in Chile, with a focus on cost, services, eligibility, financial aspects, and consumer satisfaction.
1. Banmédica(Official website: https://www.banmedica.cl)
- Cost: Monthly premiums generally range from 7% of income plus voluntary top-ups depending on coverage level and risk profile.
- Available Services: Comprehensive plans offering access to private hospitals and clinics, specialist consultations, surgeries, maternity, dental, and diagnostic services.
- Open for All: Membership is voluntary, but health screenings and risk assessments can limit acceptance or increase premiums.
- Core Financial Features: Income-based mandatory contribution (7%) plus optional additional payments for enhanced coverage; recent legal rulings require standardized risk pricing.
- Consumer Satisfaction Score: Banmédica enjoys a strong reputation with around 75–80% satisfaction, praised for service quality and broad provider networks.
2. Colmena(Official website: https://www.colmena.cl)
- Cost: Premiums vary based on income and risk factors, typically starting from the mandatory 7% income contribution with optional top-ups.
- Available Services: Full private healthcare coverage including hospitalization, outpatient care, dental, mental health, and chronic disease management.
- Open for All: Voluntary membership; applicants undergo health assessments.
- Core Financial Features: Income-based premium model, co-payments depend on chosen plan tier.
- Consumer Satisfaction Score: Well-regarded for customer support and provider network, scoring approximately 70–75%.
3. Consalud(Official website: https://www.consalud.cl)
- Cost: Similar structure to other ISAPREs, with base 7% income contributions plus optional plan enhancements.
- Available Services: Extensive benefits including preventive care, specialist access, emergency services, elective surgeries, and maternity.
- Open for All: Open with underwriting; pre-existing conditions may affect acceptance.
- Core Financial Features: Risk-adjusted premiums limited by recent regulations; co-payments apply.
- Consumer Satisfaction Score: Generally positive with a score near 75%, noted for network quality and claim responsiveness.
4. Cruz Blanca(Official website: https://www.cruzblanca.cl)
- Cost: Premiums start at the mandatory 7% of income, plus voluntary supplements for upgraded plans.
- Available Services: Private hospital access, comprehensive outpatient and inpatient care, maternity, dental, and wellness programs.
- Open for All: Voluntary enrollment with health risk evaluation.
- Core Financial Features: Risk rating constrained by law; co-pays vary by plan.
- Consumer Satisfaction Score: Solid reputation, around 70%, with positive reviews for customer service.
5. Nueva Masvida(Official website: https://www.nuevamasvida.cl)
- Cost: Standard ISAPRE income-based contributions with additional premiums for higher-tier plans.
- Available Services: Wide coverage of private healthcare services, including specialist consultations, hospitalization, preventive care, and chronic disease management.
- Open for All: Voluntary with underwriting processes.
- Core Financial Features: Premiums influenced by income and risk; limited premium variation due to regulatory changes.
- Consumer Satisfaction Score: Slightly lower compared to peers, around 65–70%, with some concerns about administrative efficiency.
READ MORE: Private and public health insurance of Trinidad and Tobago (Make informed choices)